A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant during the lawful timeline.
For the core on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been performed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.